Thirdeyemom

China’s controversial one-child policy

This is an original post by thirdeyemom on World Mom’s Blog published today.  

Photo above of the female lion which is always located on the west side of a building while the male lion, which is considered more important in ancient times, is located on the east side, towards the rising sun.

Imagine living in a place where your reproductive life was controlled by the government.  A place that not only controlled the number of children you were allowed to have but also the timeframe.  A place that enforced stiff fines, allowed forced sterilization and even forced abortions when you were breaking the law.  Imagine living in remote, impoverished parts of rural China.  This is what life is like for most women in these far off, often forgotten parts of the world, a place that accounts for millions of China’s 1.3 billion people.

China’s controversial one-child policy was implemented by the Communist regime in 1978 as a way to control China’s soaring population and help alleviate some of the related negative social, economic and environmental consequences.  Born at a time before China’s dramatic ascent as the world’s number two economy, the one-child policy was enforced as a way to keep China’s exploding population at bay.

Although the policy has shifted slightly over the years, the main legislation intact today restricts married, urban couples to having only one child while allowing some exceptions for rural couples, ethnic minorities or parents without any siblings themselves.

The policy has had significant effects and over the years has decreased fertility to such low levels that it’s almost had a reverse, negative effect on China as whole.  Chinese authorities claim that the policy has been a success by preventing around 400 million births since its inception.  However, demographers and human rights activists beg to differ as they believe the the policy has succeeded in bringing down the birth rate too sharp and too fast and has systematically abused the rights of the Chinese people, namely women and girls.

Recent accounts of the male versus female gender ratio reveals an abnormally high ratio of Chinese males per females.

Per a recent article in the New York Times titled “The Plight of China’s Favored Sons” demographers believe that “nationally, China’s sex ratio at birth is 120 boys per girls; in rural areas, where couples often have more than one child, the sex ratio at birth for second children rises to 145.  By comparison, the U.S. sex ratio at birth is 105 boys per 100 girls.  The main reason for this gap is the use of ultrasound scanners to determine the gender of fetuses, followed by the abortion of many female ones”.

There is also a significant concern that China’s one-child policy will lead to not enough young people to care for their elderly parents, a common, traditional obligation in China.  For who will be available to take care of China’s graying population when there is only one child per family?  Finally, there are huge concerns that the imbalance in males versus females could lead to as many as 40 million or more Chinese men without a wife.  That could have huge negative implications on society as a whole.

What have been the implications of this policy for women and girls?  The human rights abuses against the mothers-to-be and the unborn female children who are either aborted or left in the hands of a poor peasant farmer who prayed for a son to help out on the farm, is believed to have led to increased levels of female infanticide and magical “disappearance” of girl babies.    Sadly, sex discrimination is extremely prevalent in rural China where the boy is still the prized possession of the family.  This is especially true in the countryside where boys are required to work hard and help out at the farm.  Fortunately, peasants are able to have a second child free of charge in the event that the first child is a girl.  However, if the second one is girl, either they are out of luck or sometimes they abort it.

Making matters worse, many rural officials are paid a reward in relationship to their compliance and achievement of the birth rate quota in their villages.  Thus sadly to say, mass forced sterilization or late term abortions of a second-child fetus occur and sometimes in a large extent.  Although illegal, the central government has little or no control over this tragic truth that is all too common in remote villages in China.

Per Amnesty International, children born outside the quota have limited rights and are not issued “hukou” documents which provide access to health care, education or other social services.  The parents also suffer for having the forbidden second child and often face harsh penalties and fines up to four or five times their annual salary.

As the largest population in the world, in which one in five people on this planet is Chinese, what should China do?  What is the ethical choice?

————————————————

To read more about China’s one-child policy, please visit fellow blogger Shards of China’s informative post called “Sex in China:  One-Child Policy”.  Click here to see post.  I am really enjoying Nick’s posts on China, Egypt and more.  Check it out!


11 comments

  1. I heard about this so many years ago. I’m into the voluntary decision that couples have a choice as to how many kids they can have based on what “bright” future they can give to each child. I’m into responsible parenthood. I don’t favor people who kept making children without a thought as to what would happen to their child as soon as they are born. I’ve seen parents using their children as early as toddler to beg for money….and it breaks my heart that this child has to face the world like this. But I also don’t favor restricting a couples right to have more that one child just because it’s a law. I believe it’s a law against humanity, against pro-creation. Honestly, I heard of even horror stories of what happens to the new born when the parents are caught violating the law. I will not say it here because I think it’s sad and inhuman. I’m glad you made this post. It takes one person to open the world’s eye to the realties of things….Happy Valentine’s Day. Wishing you and your love ones all the love and joy.

    • Yes there are lots of horror stories involving parents who are caught in violation as well as women being forced into abortions and sterilizations that they didn’t want It is very sad. Hopefully things will change as the economy roars and they become a freer society.

  2. I cannot even imagine! It really makes me think how grateful I was to be born and given a chance at life:) I have a relative that experienced the loss of a birth about 3 to 4 months into a pregnancy; it was a loss and at times we think what if.

    • Yes I think that every time I travel. How lucky, especially as a woman, to be born in a free land with relatively equal rights and opportunities. That encourages me even more to give back and fight for women’s rights and education.

    • Yes, crazy isn’t it. I know India has a booming population too but they do not force the one-child rule. It will be interesting to see what happens in the future.

    • Thanks Jennifer! We need to catch up soon! I have a great World Moms Blog button for you from Jen Burden. It will probably have to be in March though. I’ll be in touch after Guatemala! (First week of March).

  3. There are too many children being born, but legislation is not the answer. Generally the more educated women in thirld world countries become, the fewer children they have. This is certainly happening in India, where the middle class, urban Indians are having only one or two children, because they want to give them the best opportunities for education and a good life. The rural families are still having lots of children to help on farms. Hopefully this will change too as they become better off ( if they become better off)

  4. Pingback: Reblog: Human Rights China’s Forced Abortions | thirdeyemom

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: